| 
						CROSSING THE LINE The General stands like a statue 
						among his soldiers. 
						Even the freezing December wind seems unable to 
						penetrate his stoic countenance. 
						Washington
						has refused to meet with the mortally wounded Hessian 
						Colonel Rall, saying that Rall is a mercenary who fights 
						for profit. Then General Green approaches Washington and says, with 
						deep wisdom, “Our own cause is at its heart a fight 
						against British taxation, is it not? In the end, Sir, we 
						all kill for profit.”   
						WHAT? I was enjoying the A&E movie
						The Crossing 
						until that moment. Sure, they had taken liberties with 
						the historic record in some areas. Yes, the film had 
						failed to portray just how hard the weather was (No snow 
						in Trenton?). But the film 
						was well acted, with Jeff Daniels playing the difficult 
						role of Washington and surrounded 
						by some other wonderful actors. Then this line came up 
						right near the end of the movie, as if it were the 
						message of the whole film. “Our own cause is at its 
						heart a fight against British Taxation…we all kill for 
						profit.”  
						How could they have gotten it so wrong?    
						None of our famous agitator founders opposed 
						taxes in principal. The famous excise on tea was not 
						terribly burdensome and the taxes in 
						Boston
						where the Tea Party occurred were pretty light. It 
						wasn’t about the money; it was the principle. By 1776 
						America
						had been running itself for over 100 years, separate 
						from England. 
						Americans had always assumed they had all the rights of 
						any British Citizen; now they found that 
						England
						was making laws that encroached on those rights and they 
						had no say in the matter. Taxes were not the first abuse 
						of power, but they were an abuse that applied to 
						everyone in the colonies. 
						As such they became a common cause to rally 
						around.   
						 Again, this was not the first abuse. 
						Before this, England had claimed the right to 
						search and seize without warrant and to quarter soldiers 
						in people’s homes against their will and without 
						compensation. The early patriot James Otis is attributed 
						as the first to say “Taxation without representation is 
						tyranny.” He went on to say “For what civil right is 
						worth a rush (stem of a plant considered of little 
						value), after a man’s property is subject to be taken 
						from him at pleasure without his consent?” By the time 
						of the Battle of Trenton many more abuses of power had 
						occurred, including the seizing of gun powder stores 
						that a town had collected for its own defense. Today it 
						would be like a foreign army marching into town and 
						ripping the locks off your front door.
						 If you want to 
						see a complete list of reasons the colonies were in 
						revolt, look in The Declaration of Independence. 
						It lists 27, of which “For imposing Taxes on us 
						without our Consent” only ranks at #17.   
						   |   “For what civil right is worth 
						a rush, after a man’s property is subject to be taken 
						from him at pleasure without his consent?”                            
						-James Otis  So the Revolution was not a fight 
						against British taxation but British abuse of power. But 
						what about that “we all kill for profit” line? Were the 
						Founders motivated by profit? Let’s take the route of 
						the Age of Reason and think this through. Many of the 
						founders, though certainly not all, were wealthy by the 
						standards of the day. They either had successful 
						businesses or inherited money and property. How do you 
						profit from starting a war in your own backyard with the 
						most powerful military nation in the world? They had 
						everything to lose and many did. Washington lost money throughout the war his Presidential 
						years by constantly pouring his own money into the cause 
						of Liberty. War engulfed the land for eight 
						years. Homes and farms were destroyed, businesses were 
						ruined, disease raged, and 25,000 lives were lost. Today 
						that percentage of our population would add up to 3 
						million people. Exactly what profit was there? It 
						certainly wasn’t financial.     
						So why did this movie that started so well take a 
						turn towards what can at best be called revisionist 
						history, and is probably more rightfully called 
						slanderous deceit? The answer came when I researched the 
						author, an intelligent and extremely talented man by the 
						name of Howard Fast. Howard seems to have a bit of a 
						political agenda. In 1952 he ran for Congress on the 
						American Labor Party Ticket and worked for the communist 
						party newspaper 
						The Daily Worker. In 1953 he was awarded the Stalin 
						Peace Prize. It seems he views his history through some 
						skewed glasses. Don’t string up Howard too fast, though; 
						he also wrote the classic film
						Spartacus. 
						Because those Patriots of ‘76 fought for his rights (and 
						not for profit), Howard Fast is able to enjoy the same 
						freedom of thought and speech we all do.    
						The 
						Crossing is a pretty good film. Hollywood does not seem to 
						give us many good movies set in the Founding era, 
						despite the fact that it is full of great dramatic 
						stories. You should rent it as we approach the holiday 
						season and the anniversary of the Crossing. Just keep in 
						mind the true reasons why these people fought, and keep 
						hoping that the next film will finally get it right.   
						
						    SUPPORT THE REVOLUTION 
						
                      Donate Today |